Women’s Prize for Fiction, 2022: The Final Revival of Opal & Nev


First things first: I found The Final Revival of Opal & Nev intensely frustrating. There’s so much potential here, but the novel feels like an early draft of itself. As this is Dawnie Walton’s debut, I hope more of that potential is fulfilled in her next book. I’ve also found it difficult to talk about this novel without intermittently mentioning spoilers. If you want to avoid these, click through to my Goodreads review, which has spoiler tags.

The Final Revival of Opal & Nev is told as a series of excerpts from oral history interviews collected by journalist Sunny, who also provides a framing narrative for the novel. (This structural choice feels like a bit of a mash-up between two Taylor Jenkins Reid novels – Daisy Jones and the Six and The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo). Opal & Nev were an iconic rock duo in the 1970s, but later split to pursue solo careers, and are now planning a final reunion. Their early days, however, were overshadowed by a concert that turned violent when their black drummer Jimmy was murdered by white racists. Here, Sunny has a personal stake; Jimmy was her father, and was having an affair with Opal when he died.

The Final Revival of Opal & Nev turns on a central revelation at the midpoint of the novel, when we find out that what we thought happened at that fatal concert was not the full story. In short, we discover that Nev may have made Jimmy a target of racist violence by falsely telling the thuggish band that he stole their Confederate flag. I was disappointed by this twist; basically, because I feel that twists in novels should make stories more complex, not less so. The initial draw of Opal and Nev for the reader is the question of how two such different people formed a creative collaboration. We fully expect it to fall apart and we suspect it will be because Nev will be unable to recognise his white privilege and the difficulties Opal faces as a radical black female artist. The twist, therefore, is hardly a surprise, it’s a confirmation of what we already knew.

In structural terms, this twist and its placement in the novel robs the rest of the book of any momentum. We know we’re going to watch Opal & Nev’s ultimate decline. From my point of view as a reader – and I acknowledge this might not have worked with Walton’s vision for the novel – it would have been much more interesting if Nev had played no role in Jimmy’s death, but if he and Opal had come to blows over her onstage protest after the concert. Maybe he could even have wrongly blamed her for inciting violence? This would show his obliviousness as a white man, but have opened up more subtle fault-lines between them that were genuinely about race rather than sexual jealousy.

A number of reviewers note that, with the exception of Opal, Walton tends to rely on stereotype, and I would agree; aside from the flattening of Nev’s character, we have the white ‘trailer trash’ racists, the flamboyant gay costume designer, the Bernie Sanders fan who thinks everything is about false consciousness, the greedy record label head honcho… Again, this is only more frustrating because there are flashes of greater insight in her writing. I loved that Opal’s deeply religious sister, Pearl, was not a villain but a source of support, for example, and had a great singing voice of her own. Having said that, I thought that Opal herself was also unevenly developed as a character. Her affair with Jimmy is so pivotal to the novel, but we barely see the two together. There’s also a suggestion that her key conflict is between her desire for recognition and her own values, but I never really felt this – Opal always seemed to come down on the right side of history. Finally, we don’t get enough of Opal and Nev when things were good between them, which means his betrayal doesn’t land with enough emotional weight. Sunny, also, never comes alive in her own right.

There’s a lot that’s good about this book – the imaginative descriptions of Opal & Nev’s hit songs and their stage performances, and the ways in which they intersected with seventies protest culture, are brilliant – but it didn’t quite land for me.

I’m not aiming to read all sixteen books on the Women’s Prize longlist this year, but I’ve selected eleven titles that I do want to read. This is number seven. I’ve already read Great CircleThe Book of Form and Emptiness, Careless, The Sentence, The Paper Palace and Remote Sympathy.


14 thoughts on “Women’s Prize for Fiction, 2022: The Final Revival of Opal & Nev

  1. I agree with you completely that the twist fell rather flat. Its placement certainly made the rest of the book drag for me. I understand what Walton was trying to do, but the execution felt clumsy. I also really wish that the book had had stronger characterization. It would have made it much easier for me to overlook some of its other faults. I appreciate your point, though, about Pearl as a source of support. I have found it interesting how many titles from this year’s longlist have included religion as a theme, depicting both the flaws within religious institutions but also the way that they can be safe spaces/intersect more positively with character’s lives.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I think we’re on the same page with this one! For me, the structural and character issues went hand in hand; the twist made Nev a less interesting character. Really great point about religion. Off the top of my head, Catholicism is a real source of support for Greta in Remote Sympathy; and indigenous religious beliefs are central to the lives of many of the characters in The Sentence.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Catholicism also plays a significant role in The Bread the Devil Knead, where it is both criticized and shown to be a potential source of good. This One Sky Day also touches on religion, contrasting the indigenous religion of Popisho with a more Western-inspired religion. There are quite a few reoccurring themes across the longlist, but this one isn’t as obvious from the blurbs, so it has been really interesting to watch it crop up over the course of several books as I wasn’t necessarily expecting it.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I bought this last year. I’m sure I’ll enjoy it, but what a shame about the path not followed, the twist that straightens things and the Daisy Jones stylistic comparison. First novel throwing everything at it, then having to simplify to reach an ending perhaps?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Hm, I’ve not fancied this and you’ve saved me completely from it now – thank you! I mean, I transcribe too many interviews with 70s and other musicians to make it a comfortable read for me, anyway!!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: Women’s Prize for Fiction, 2022: Build Your House Around My Body | Laura Tisdall

  5. Pingback: Women’s Prize for Fiction, 2022: The Bread the Devil Knead and Sorrow and Bliss | Laura Tisdall

  6. Pingback: Women’s Prize for Fiction, 2022: Creatures of Passage | Laura Tisdall

  7. Pingback: Women’s Prize for Fiction Shortlist, 2022: Wishlist and Predictions | Laura Tisdall

  8. Pingback: Women’s Prize for Fiction 2022: Final Thoughts | Laura Tisdall

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s