The Women’s Prize Longlist, 2022

The Women’s Prize for Fiction longlist 2022 has been announced! Here are some other bloggers’ reactions: Rebecca, Eric, Rachel.


First Thoughts: This is a very surprising list. There are seven books on it that I’d never heard of, and many of the titles don’t seem to have featured on anybody’s prediction list. I feel like I’ve done quite well with my predictions even though I only got four titles right (plus correctly predicting that Beautiful World, Where Are You and To Paradise wouldn’t feature). It’s a racially diverse list, certainly more so than last year’s; half of the authors are women of colour. But I feel a little uneasy about how few of the books anyone in the blogging community seems to have read. Perhaps the judges have uncovered a lot of hidden gems, and there certainly seem to be some small presses represented, which is good. But to omit so many obvious contenders feels a bit contrary to me, almost as if they deliberately wanted to surprise everyone, which I don’t think is the right spirit with which to approach the Prize. Finally, there are a lot of ghosts, contemporary historical settings (1970s, 80s, 90s…), and of course, conflicted mothers.

I was already not planning to read the entire longlist this year, and I certainly won’t be doing it now I have 14 books to read! But here are my thoughts and plans:

The Ones I’ve Read

Maggie Shipstead, Great Circle. Oh dear. I thought this Booker-shortlisted account of the life of fictional female aviator Marian Graves was likely to be on the list, but I found it clunky, melodramatic, ridiculously overlong and a bit cliched. It also has a contemporary thread that could easily have been cut without making any difference to the novel at all. It did have about fifty brilliant pages, when Shipstead describes Graves’s flight over Antarctica – but these came at the end of the novel and were not enough to save it. My review is here.

Ruth Ozeki, The Book of Form and Emptiness. Oh dear again! I’m a huge Ozeki fan but I thought this was so incredibly twee. Even more so than Great Circle, it does have its strengths – the characterisation of the teenage protagonist, Benny, and his hoarder mother, Annabel, was beautifully complex. But it was far too long and had far too many lines like ‘Books don’t have eyes or hands, it’s true, but when a book and a reader are meant for each other, both of them know it.’ My review is here.

The Ones I Already Wanted To Read

Violet Kupersmith, Build Your House Around My Body. This was on my Women’s Prize wishlist, so I’m very pleased to see it here. This Vietnam-set novel follows three women in different timelines and promises ‘eerie Vietnamese forests, rundown zoos and crowded nightclubs‘.

The Ones I Now Want To Read

Catherine Chidgey, Remote Sympathy. I usually avoid anything set during the Second World War, especially if it’s about the Holocaust, but I’m a little intrigued by this one, which sounds a bit like Audrey Magee’s The UndertakingIt focuses on the wife of a SS Sturmbannführer who lives near Buchenwald concentration camp and forms an unlikely alliance with one of the prisoners, who believes he has invented a cure for cancer.

Morowa Yejidé, Creatures of Passage. OK, so I LOVE the sound of this; it follows a woman ferrying passengers in a haunted car in late 1970s Washington DC. Definitely up for trying it.

Dawnie Walton, The Final Revival of Opal and Nev. This sounds a lot like Taylor Jenkins Reid’s Daisy Jones and the Six, which I loved – it even seems to be structured in the same way, patching together excerpts from fictional oral histories. It follows the rise of an interracial rock duo in the 1970s and explores why their partnership fell apart.

Kirsty Capes, Careless. Definitely one of the more ‘accessible’, ‘popular’ choices on the list, this is set in the 1990s and stars care-leaver Bess, written by an author who is herself care-experienced. I’m not sure this will work for me as a novel but it’s a topic I’d like to read more about.

Louise Erdrich, The Sentence. I wasn’t really sure about Erdrich’s The Round House and I haven’t read anything by her since. Still, I like the blurb of this one and I’d like to give her another go: ‘A small independent bookstore in Minneapolis is haunted from November 2019 to November 2020 by the store’s most annoying customer.’

The Ones I Still Don’t Want To Read

Elif Shafak, The Island of Missing Trees. I haven’t actually read anything by Shafak and I feel I should, but whenever I flick through one of her novels, I don’t feel like her prose is for me. I don’t find the blurb of this one appealing, either: two Cypriot teenagers, one Greek and one Turkish, fall in love and are parted when war breaks out.

Lisa Allen-Agostini, The Bread The Devil Knead. This looks like an interesting longlist choice from a small press, but again, the blurb isn’t calling me: it focuses on a forty-year-old Trinidadian woman who manages a boutique in Port of Spain and is dealing with both an abusive partner and an affair with her boss.

Charlotte Mendelson, The Exhibitionist. I wasn’t a fan of Mendelson’s Almost English and I’m certainly not taken by another tale of middle-class family secrets.

Meg Mason, Sorrow and Bliss. This was on my radar already and I’d already decided not to read it. This sort of novel that focuses very closely on the mental health struggles of a single protagonist is not really my thing, although it sounds like Mason can write.

Lulu Allison, Salt Lick. This is narrated by a chorus of feral cows… which is brilliant, but it really doesn’t sound like my thing.

Miranda Cowley Heller, The Paper Palace. I’d not heard of this book before I listened to Anna’s critical review of it, and I can’t say the blurb is inspiring.

Leone Ross, This One Sky Day. Another one I’d already decided against reading. It sounds like it steers too close to magical realism for my tastes.

Rachel Elliott, Flamingo. This sounds like it will be twee. I am suspicious.

The Ones That Should Have Been On The Longlist

Obviously, Julia Armfield’s Our Wives Under The Sea HAS BEEN ROBBED. But apart from this TRAVESTY, I’m struggling to think of anything else I really wanted to see. Hanya Yanagihara’s To Paradise is an excellent novel, but it was never Women’s Prize material. I didn’t love Xóchitl González’s Olga Dies Dreamingbut I liked it a lot and I think it would have made for some great discussion. Finally, I didn’t adore Lauren Groff’s Matrix enough to be truly aggrieved that it didn’t make it, but I think it deserves to be here – especially as I think there are NO historical novels on the list set earlier than the twentieth century!

The Ones I’m Glad Not To See On The Longlist

Well I am obviously pleased that Hannah Kent’s Devotion isn’t here, and I am also pleased to see no Greek myth retellings. Apart from that there’s nothing that I was really dreading!

What are your thoughts on this year’s Women’s Prize longlist?


19 thoughts on “The Women’s Prize Longlist, 2022

  1. I’ve only read Build My House Around My Body, which I really enjoyed but am surprised to see on the list, because of its horror genre. I hadn’t heard of eight of these before yesterday which I found surprising. Not that I am the oracle when it comes to what has been released, but I can’t think of a recent longlist where I’ve known so few.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I would love the WP to engage more with horror and SFF, so I’m really pleased to see it on the list, even though as usual there’s not much more from those genres. I think everybody was surprised this year – I’d not heard of 7 of these books before yesterday and didn’t know much about a couple of others.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Our Wives Under The Sea is superb! From this list, I’m definitely most excited to read Creatures of Passage, Build Your House Around My Body and The Final Revival of Opal and Nev.


  2. I’ve heard a lot of upset about the absence of My Phantoms, too – which I haven’t read, but given how amazing First Love was, I too am surprised that a new Gwendoline Riley could be outshone by sixteen other novels!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Interesting. I thought First Love was excellent and My Phantoms is excellent too (if a little repetitive), but for me Riley’s just the sort of writer I don’t feel passionately about, so I don’t get cross when she isn’t listed for things. I’m sure My Phantoms deserves to be here though.


  3. It does feel a bit like this panel wanted to make a point of going their own way and not just nominating the usual suspects. We’ve gotten some decent genre diversity and a good racial balance as a result. I’d be willing to read a few of the ‘unknowns’ — my library system usually acquires the whole longlist, so I’ll keep an eye out for their availability. A Washington, DC setting is a must for me for sure! And Remote Sympathy does actually sound interesting; I found this review from Claire: I could be drawn by the premise of Salt Lick, but I’ll wait to read some more opinions. You might enjoy Sorrow and Bliss more than you think, despite the disaster woman/mental illness tropes. I really warmed to the voice. It’s funny and more about marriage and (not) being a parent than about mental illness as such.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hmmm, I’m not convinced by their genre diversity. It is nice to see a horror title, but we still have no SFF at all, even towards the lighter speculative end. (It’s also very weird to see no historical fiction pre C20th!) A DC setting is always a draw for me as well! I think I’ll read the Mason if it makes the shortlist, but hold off until then.


  4. I agree that it seems like the judges were trying to surprise everyone, but I am remaining cautiously optimistic that they really have found some hidden gems. I may report back once I have read the longlist that it is awful, but I am really hoping that won’t be the case. The fact that they have included so many unknowns is actually what has convinced me attempt to read the entire longlist – I want to see if there was merit in their choices, I guess. The problem is that I have now have two sizeable sets of books to read – the longlist and the books that I thought were going to be on the longlist!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I really hope this is the case, and I’ll be very interested to read your reviews of the entire longlist, as this isn’t something I felt I could take on this year! There are definitely more I’m interested in reading from this list than from last year’s list.


  5. There are definitely a few I’m intrigued by, but on the whole I found it a pretty underwhelming list, unfortunately. I had already decided I wouldn’t be committing to the list this year though, so I’m intrigued to see which ones end up going down well with bloggers – especially since so many of them were largely unknown before the announcement!

    Liked by 1 person

    • That’s a shame. I feel like I’m in the middle here – I’m not thrilled by it but not especially underwhelmed either. Might just be because I was so unimpressed by the last two longlists that my expectations were v low!! Also apart from Our Wives, there’s nothing I feel like has really been ‘robbed’, so that helps.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Pingback: Women’s Prize for Fiction 2022 – Longlist Reaction – the [blank] garden

  7. No Greek myths, hooray! I was a bit surprised by the list, to have never heard of most of them, even blog chatter. I have the Mendelson to read (I’ve liked the other(s?) of hers I’ve read) so will report back on that asap.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Pingback: The Jhalak Prize Longlist, 2022 | Laura Tisdall

  9. Pingback: Women’s Prize for Fiction, 2022: The Paper Palace and Remote Sympathy | Laura Tisdall

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s